Procurement & ESG: How to Build an Effective Strategy with Your Suppliers

The ESG topic (Environment, Social, Governance) is no longer just a “nice to have” for Procurement departments. It has become a strategic performance and management criterion.
According to a recent study, 92% of large buying organizations now require ESG data from their suppliers. These data influence purchasing decisions, business relationships, and increasingly, corporate reputation.
Beyond compliance, the numbers speak for themselves: top ESG-rated companies outperform peers by 4.3% annually, show 10–20% higher growth and valuation, and reduce costs by 5–10% through greater operational efficiency and waste reduction (source: Veridion).
In short, ESG is no longer just a regulatory mandate—it’s a lever for competitiveness and resilience.
Growing Regulatory and Organizational Pressure
The introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is accelerating this shift. It mandates structured, verifiable non-financial reporting, with a phased rollout between 2024 and 2027 depending on company size. Procurement departments are now at the core of this transformation: they must collect, consolidate, and verify ESG data from suppliers—often at scale and across complex supply chains.
This is a massive challenge.
According to Veridion, 31% of companies identify administrative complexity—data collection, response tracking, system management—as the main obstacle to implementing an effective ESG strategy.
So how can organizations evaluate their suppliers’ ESG maturity while ensuring information reliability and a smooth process?
Easily Launch Your ESG Strategy with Aprovall’s Initial ESG Module
To answer this need, Aprovall has developed the Initial ESG Module, a tool designed to help organizations gradually structure their ESG approach. Available via the Aprovall platform, this module allows you to establish a clear, simple, and operational ESG assessment baseline without requiring prior expertise.
Its purpose? To help Procurement, CSR, and Compliance teams quickly identify the level of ESG commitment and maturity of their suppliers, while raising internal awareness around best practices.
The Initial ESG Module offers:
- A guided assessment path, focused on essentials, for a practical first integration of environmental, social, and ethical criteria into the supply chain.
- A structured evaluation methodology, based on a 70-question survey aligned with the ESRS framework.
- A progressive and scalable approach, paving the way to Aprovall’s expert modules (Decarbonization, Biodiversity, Ethics, Decent Work, etc.).
- 3 main scores (E, S, G) to quickly visualize overall third-party commitment.
- 12 detailed sub-scores to refine analysis and identify improvement areas.
- A ready-to-use dashboard, for easy results sharing with relevant departments.
- Automated collection of supporting documents, ensuring reliable and streamlined tracking.
A Tool Built for Real-World Use Cases
The Initial ESG Module addresses various challenges faced by Procurement departments:
- Want to assess your suppliers’ ESG maturity before launching a broader initiative? This module offers a clear and structured starting point.
- Need to prepare for CSRD requirements? It helps you collect key initial data and prioritize actions.
- Planning to focus efforts on a specific topic like decarbonization or resource management? The module lets you measure supplier commitment before diving deeper.
Thanks to its pragmatic design, it fits both large corporations and public institutions or mid-sized businesses looking to build their ESG strategy step by step.
Organizational Benefits
The Initial ESG Module is designed to be the first lever of responsible transformation:
Scalability
Unlock access to advanced modules covering decarbonization, biodiversity, governance, and ethics.
Structure and clarity
Lay the groundwork for a simple, coherent ESG evaluation method.
Collective engagement
Sensibilisez vos équipes et vos partenaires fournisseurs autour des enjeux RSE.

Transparency
Visualize ESG contributions globally or by supply chain.
Ready to strengthen your third-party risk management program?
These articles might interest you
-
16 May 2025Why Assessing Upstream Suppliers Is EssentialSolutionsUpper-Tier Suppliers: The (Too Often) Overlooked Risk in Your Supply Chain Modern procurement chains rely on a multitude of actors, each contributing to value creation—extraction, manufacturing, assembly… The final product is never the result of a single supplier but rather the outcome of an often international ecosystem. Yet, most organizations still focus their efforts and […]Read more
-
18 July 2025Why Connecting Your Risk Mapping to TPRM Is a Game ChangerSolutionsIn a context where third-party ecosystems are expanding, organizations can no longer afford to manage their vendor relationships blindly. Companies are now selecting partners based on increasingly specific criteria, and many have implemented risk mapping tools to gain a clearer view of the risks posed by their subcontractors. They must actively manage third-party risks. According […]Read more
-
03 March 2025Understanding Dynamic Risk Scoring: Fundamentals and Implementation for Third-Party GovernanceSolutionsDynamic risk scoring has become an essential tool for organizations seeking to optimize their third-party governancestrategies. With increasingly complex partnerships and growing regulatory requirements in Europe—particularly DORA and NIS 2—it is crucial to understand how this methodology transforms collaborative assessment of third-party partners. According to data reported by Sprinto, 58% of compliance teams identify assessing third-party responsiveness as their main challenge […]Read more
-
22 January 2026TPRM Organizational Silos: How to Break Down BarriersSolutionsTPRM organizational silos: In many companies, organizational silos remain a persistent reality. Procurement, Legal, Compliance, Finance, and IT often still operate as independent units, each with their own tools, priorities, and metrics. Despite years of digitalization efforts, these internal divisions continue to hinder overall organizational performance. This siloed structure has consequences. It complicates processes, delays […]Read more